"Un Long Dimanche de Fiançailles (A Very Long Engagement)" directed by Jean-Pierre Jeunet (2004)

**** 1/2 (out of five stars)
"A Very Long Engagement" is a film completely controlled by two of the strongest personas in modern cinema. Jean-Pierre Jeunet is known for his flair for whimsy and fantasy. Audrey Tautou is known for her quirky appeal. randomness is known for loving them both.
With that backdrop, I attended a screening of "A Very Long Engagement" yesterday afternoon at one of Manhattan's great single screen theatres, The Paris. I'm very used to hearing foreign tongue when attending foreign films in Manhattan. In fact, it's one of the things that makes going to the theatre much more special than simply watching a DVD in the comfort of home. I was very surprised, though, that literally the majority of the near capacity crowd at the Paris were speaking French. It made the screening really feel like an event.
Jeunet's adaption of Sébastien Japrisot's novel about a young Frenchwoman's search for her soldier fiancé at the end of World War I is certain to divide critics. Those who focus on the fairytale aspect of Jeunet's world will likely find the film a bit schizoid. His is a world of wonder that oftentimes doesn't exactly gibe with his depiction of the horrors of war. But that's simply nitpicking. It's a beautifully filmed ride on a cinematic rollercoaster. Where Amelié's pallete of greens and yellows conveyed the whimsy of the storyline, "Long Engagement" works entirely in quiet, sonber sepia tones. The tone and color, in fact, are very reminiscent of Jeunet's 1991 masterpiece, "Delicatessen." As a director, though, he's grown significantly since the Rube Goldberg sort of fascinations of "Delicatessen" and "City of Lost Children." "Engagement," instead, is a very complicated story of loss and redemption. I really can't go too much into the plot. It folds and unwinds into a mesmerizing maze of a mystery that sticks with you long after a first viewing and almost demands a second.
Audrey Tautou simply steals every scene of the film. The camera loves her. It's cliché, but there's no denying it. Her role isn't that far removed from her earlier turn with Jeunet but is devastatingly captivating. Certain scenes and images have stuck with me long after my viewing solely due to Audrey's performance. Once the film is in a wider release and some of you have actually seen it as well I'll go into detail on some of those.
The only fault with "Engagement" is that it tries to do too much and, as a result, fails to carry through everything with equal weight. It's a romance! It's war picture! It's a mystery! It's a art piece! It's all of these and more but, as a result, sometimes gets a bit messy. It's simply a great piece of work, though.
Posted by mikewolf at December 06, 2004 12:00 AMhey you who doesn't return phone calls... call me!
Posted by: Daniella on December 5, 2004 09:25 AMI am so looking forward to seeing this. Thanks for the preview.
I knew that Jeunet couldn't keep up that twisted level of deliberate visual insanity for long, but I did love it when it was going on. Do you find you miss it, or did enough of it lodge deep down that it has become a part of what he does without being the MAIN part of what he does?
Posted by: Linus on December 6, 2004 04:46 PMOh, it's still there. It's just not what immediately jumps out at you in the same way as, say, "Delicatessan." A lot of the zaniness has been replaced, in my opinion, by wonderful composites. I think that was sort of the case with Amelie, too, no?
Posted by: mrw on December 6, 2004 06:35 PMLoved Amelie. Not as much as you did, but I loved it.
After I saw it once on my own, I tried to drag a friend to it for ages, until eventually it closed. (There was a lot of subtext to this friend.) The closest we got was when she was late for a showing by about three minutes.
"We can still see it, it just started," she said, out of breath.
"And miss the gnomes??? No way!" I said. She gave me One Of Those Looks.
We ended up seeing My Big Fat Greek Wedding, which I disliked rather deeply.
Posted by: Linus on December 7, 2004 01:10 PM