So. I finally got around to watching "Demonlover" tonight. Um. Yeah. Not so good. I can handle films that don't have any narrative. I can handle films that have a narrative that is absurdly disjointed. I can handle films that are just a pleasure to look at. I can't handle a film that's so schizoid that it has no clue as to what it's doing.
For the first fifty minutes I thought that Jesse and Linus were just, well, wrong. I found it to be a fairly interesting conceit. Chloe Sevigny's high school French was much worse than mine, but I thought acting was pretty good, the plot interesting and found a lot of the visuals to be almost breathtaking.
Without too many spoilers, Gina Gershon then leaves the film and apparently takes the film's sense with her. It's bad, kids. I can almost piece together what happens, but the plot holes are simply laughable. Character development exists only to completely reversed in the very next scene. Good films with loose plots generally make more sense upon further reflection (Think Lynch. Think Cronenberg). "Demonlover" makes less and less sense as it burrows its absurdity into your skull.
Critics who liked the film (and there were a few) were willing to give director Olivier Assayas a pass on the logic. The visuals, they thought, were too stunning and the mood too hip to simply pan. In some ways they're right. I did enjoy looking at it and don't regret seeing it. However, any film that makes "Mulholland Drive" look like "Sleepless in Seattle" is doing something wrong.
Posted by mikewolf at April 25, 2004 10:04 PMThat's too bad.
It's a psychological film, more than anything else. The main character goes from being completely in control to being completely controlled. She doesn't know what to believe, whom to trust. Her psyche is thoroughly crushed.
There's no sense that she might ever escape, so there's no comfort or relief for the viewer. It's very good, but very disturbing.
Posted by: LadyCrumpet on April 26, 2004 12:59 PMI don't disagree with any of your statement, actually. It does succeed in being a tense psychological thriller on many levels. However, the holes in the logic make it a really unsatisfactory experience. I felt like there were about two hours worth of content that were simply missing.
Posted by: mrw on April 26, 2004 01:32 PMI tried to warn you, dude.
I've just written and then deleted a rather caustic further commentary about the movie, but there's no real point; suffice to say I disagree with LadyCrumpet, and no disrespect. I did not misunderstand the film, I think. I just really, really hated it. Choe Sevigny does rather well, considering; and Gina Gershon is my favorite bad actress, these days.
Posted by: Linus on April 26, 2004 03:17 PMOh, that's ok. We can agree to disagree. I mean, I was confused when Gina Gershon just kinda vanished after the pivotal scene.
The same people, maybe the same director even, did an earlier film, TechnoLust, which is a more charming, lighter-hearted film. Tilda Swinton plays four of the characters.
Posted by: LadyCrumpet on April 26, 2004 04:04 PM