January 29, 2003
reign free the dogs of war

A few of you have asked me to share my opinion of the State of the Union address that Bush gave last night. To be honest, I was so disgusted by it that I didn't plan to even mention it. Who am I, though, to deny my public?

I'll comment on the domestic portion later. The Iraq portion of the speech blew my mind.

Thirty-seven minutes. That's how long W. prattled on before uttering the word Iraq. Even then he made the bizarre decision to mention Iran first. Raise your hand if you thought he had misspoken. I know I did.

He seems to be getting good marks for his Iraq comments. I really don't get that. There was nothing new other than an allegation that the Russians have heard they tried to buy weapons-grade uranium. Maybe it's the old debater in me, but that's not good enough. I need evidence. I need facts. I need proof. Call me crazy, but an off-handed allegation isn't enough to convince me that we need to kill a bunch of people. I guess that's what we're supposed to see when Powell speaks to the UN next week. I'm very skeptical. I think that they would be screaming from the highest roof-top if we had real evidence.

Was no one else chilled by the "let's just say they're no longer a problem" line? The evil sneer was one of the more disgusting presidental displays that I have ever seen. I was also disgusted that the left side of the aisle stood on that remark. Does no one understand what he's saying? He's saying we killed a bunch of unnamed people. That's a good thing?

He smells blood. He's going after it. This is his war. He's going to fight it with or without the American people. I loved it when he said that even if the UN doesn't back us we'll lead a "broad coalition." Broad coalition? Thanks, Britain. We're now "broad."

This is Bush's war. It will never be mine.

Posted by mikewolf at January 29, 2003 11:46 AM
Comments

amen, brutha! i thought that "lets just say they're no longer a problem" line was pretty creepy too. i mean, what the fuck? is this an episode of the SOPRANOS?

i also liked the part where he said basically that we'll attack iraq with or without the aid or support of any allies because we're america goddammit and we don't need anyone! why? because we've got all the support we need. from who? that big lug in the sky, "GOD".

"god" just loves him some americans, don't he?

Posted by: the evil queen on January 29, 2003 12:19 PM

Did anyone else notice that he used the term "Hitlerism" rather than Nazism? Hitlerism is a legitmate term, just not one that's usually used. At first I wondered why he'd make that odd choice. Then I figured it out...

He didn't want to offend all of the Nazis that will vote for him in 2004

Posted by: mrw on January 29, 2003 03:53 PM

> the Russians have heard they tried to buy weapons-grade uranium. Maybe it's the old debater in me, but that's not good enough.

Posted by: deano on January 29, 2003 04:19 PM

Not to defend anyone's politics, but I heard on NPR this morning that Tony Blair had a document supporting Bush's stance. It was supposedly signed by leaders from 8 countries. I don't know which countries and whether they included ones like Puerto Rico or not, but 8 is more than GB alone (unless some of the 8 were Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, England, etc - that'd be pretty funny actually).

Posted by: Meredith on January 30, 2003 01:46 PM

According to CNN the eight are --

Blair
Italy
Spain
Portugal
Denmark
Czech Republic (they say Vaclav Havel signed it which I would find very disappointing)
Poland
Hungry

Not exactly a who's-who of foreign powers...

Posted by: mrw on January 30, 2003 02:40 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?